|
| |
Timely Neuropathy Testing
(Note: TNT makes monofilaments of standard design
including 38 mm length of the monofilament as it leaves the rod, and specific
diameters used in normative studies. The length is not adjusted because if
the lengths and diameters of monofilaments differ from those used in normative
studies, the monofilaments are not standard, and cannot be directly compared
with normative data.)

The material in sets has been previously calibrated for force of application
within a specific standard deviation and range.
It has been found if the monofilament material is pure nylon, if the
diameters are correct, and the
length is 38 mm from the point the monofilament
leaves the rod, the monofilament stimulus is accurate to specifications used in
normative studies, and repeatable within a small range.
 | Due to the
potential wide variations in monofilament manufacture, all studies using the monofilaments need to report
their source of monofilaments, specific calibration, diameter size of monofilament used, and length. |
 | In order to compare results from testing with normative studies, the
monofilament length should be identical to the 38
mm length of the filament used in the studies. Currently some
manufacturers are producing monofilaments at different lengths, and these
cannot be compared to normative studies even if the manufacturer used standard
lengths in previous normative studies but now at different lengths unless
additional comparison studies are done.
Bell-Krotoski JA, Fess EE, Hiltz D, Figarola J: "Threshold Detection and
Semmes Weinstein Monofilaments: A Comparative Study", J Hand Ther,
8:155-162, 1995. |
 | Measurement of force of application (with a given size monofilament of
a specific diameter) is the same as measurement of pressure on application
- there is no change in the magnitude of strength, only the way it is
calculated; pressure is force/unit area. The stimulus can be
reported in either calculation as desired using a table of the diameters.
But, since the area of a given monofilament is always constant, it is
easier for clinicians to understand the units of force rather than
pressure. Reporting force (with constant area) is considered more
accurate for the monofilaments, because the monofilaments bend, making the
entire area their tip potentially not in full contact with the skin when
applied, but rather a crescent shaped edge. |
 | Currently our instrument measurement system is being redesigned. When up and
running, our monofilaments
are calibrated on tiny strain gauge load cells to assure they
fall within specifications for respective monofilament size. |
 | Certification of force of application will be available on request for
research projects where exacting force of application
should be reported in studies. Our plan is to offer certification of force of
application i.e. certification of calibration for testing sets
professionals use in research studies. Through the use of
instrument measurement equipment designed to sensitively and
accurately measure the dynamic force of application of the nylon
monofilaments, we will offer the most advanced calibration possible.
Check back for further details when available. |
Measurement of Diameter: A micrometer is used to measure
the diameter of the monofilament (available at Sears or through
scientific catalogues).*
Measurement of Stimulus Force of Application: Measurement of
the monofilament dynamic force of application requires sophisticated
instrumentation that can accurately show and measure its dynamic force
and vibration. Top loading weight and balance scales typically
used in laboratories have been found not sufficiently accurate, and
measurement required the design of a specific dedicated measurement
system.**
*, **
Bell JA, Buford WL: "The Force Time Relationship of Clinically Used Sensory
Testing Instruments", Presented at the 37th
Annual Meeting of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand, Aurora, Colorado,
1982.
Bell-Krotoski JA, Buford WL: "The Force/Time
Relationship of Clinically Used Sensory Testing Instruments", J Hand Ther,
1(2):76, 1988.
Bell-Krotoski JA, Tomancik E: "Repeatability of Testing With the
Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments", J Hand Surg
2A:15, 1987.
Buford, WL, Bell JA: "Dynamic Properties of Hand Held Tactile Assessment
Stimuli", Proceedings of the thirty-fourth annual conference of Engineering in
Medicine and Biology, 23:307,
1981.

|