Home Contents

Calibration Info
 
      Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments
,  Clear Vision Reveals™,  Low Temperature Thermoplastic

Timely Neuropathy Testing

(Note: TNT makes monofilaments of standard design including 38 mm length of the monofilament as it leaves the rod, and specific diameters used in normative studies.  The length is not adjusted because if the lengths and diameters of monofilaments differ from those used in normative studies, the monofilaments are not standard, and cannot be directly compared with normative data.)

 

The material in sets has been previously calibrated for force of application within a specific standard deviation and range.  
It has been found if the monofilament material is pure nylon, if the diameters are correct, and the length is 38 mm from the point the monofilament leaves the rod, the monofilament stimulus is accurate to specifications used in normative studies, and repeatable within a small range. 

 
bulletDue to the potential wide variations in monofilament manufacture, all studies using the monofilaments need to report their source of monofilaments, specific calibration, diameter size of monofilament used, and length.

 
bulletIn order to compare results from testing with normative studies, the monofilament length should be identical to the 38 mm length of the filament used in the studies. Currently some manufacturers are producing monofilaments at different lengths, and these cannot be compared to normative studies even if the manufacturer used standard lengths in previous normative studies but now at different lengths unless additional comparison studies are done.  Bell-Krotoski JA, Fess EE, Hiltz D, Figarola J: "Threshold Detection and Semmes Weinstein Monofilaments: A Comparative Study", J Hand Ther, 8:155-162, 1995.

 
bulletMeasurement of force of application (with a given size monofilament of a specific diameter) is the same as measurement of pressure on application - there is no change in the magnitude of strength, only the way it is calculated; pressure is force/unit area.  The stimulus can be reported in either calculation as desired using a table of the diameters.  But, since the area of a given monofilament is always constant, it is easier for clinicians to understand the units of force rather than pressure.  Reporting force (with constant area) is considered more accurate for the monofilaments, because the monofilaments bend, making the entire area their tip potentially not in full contact with the skin when applied, but rather a crescent shaped edge.

 
bulletCurrently our instrument measurement system is being redesigned. When up and running, our monofilaments 
are calibrated on tiny strain gauge load cells to assure they fall within specifications for respective monofilament size. 

 
bulletCertification of force of application will be available on request for research projects where exacting force of application
should be reported in studies. Our plan is to offer certification of force of application i.e. certification of calibration for testing sets professionals use in research studies.  Through the use of instrument measurement equipment designed to sensitively and accurately measure the dynamic force of application of the nylon monofilaments, we will offer the most advanced calibration possible. Check back for further details when available.

 

Measurement of Diameter: A micrometer is used to measure the diameter of the monofilament (available at Sears or through scientific catalogues).*

Measurement of Stimulus Force of Application: Measurement of the monofilament dynamic force of application requires sophisticated instrumentation that can accurately show and measure its dynamic force and vibration.  Top loading weight and balance scales typically used in laboratories have been found not sufficiently accurate, and measurement required the design of a specific dedicated measurement system.**


*, ** Bell JA, Buford WL: "The Force Time Relationship of Clinically Used Sensory Testing Instruments", Presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand, Aurora, Colorado, 1982.

Bell-Krotoski JA, Buford WL: "The Force/Time Relationship of Clinically Used Sensory Testing Instruments", J Hand Ther, 1(2):76, 1988.

Bell-Krotoski JA, Tomancik E: "Repeatability of Testing With the Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments", J Hand Surg 2A:15, 1987.

Buford, WL, Bell JA: "Dynamic Properties of Hand Held Tactile Assessment Stimuli", Proceedings of the thirty-fourth annual conference of Engineering in Medicine and Biology, 23:307, 1981.

 


 


 

 



Home ]

 

Send mail to timelyneuropathytesting.com with questions or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2006 Timely Neuropathy Testing
Last modified: May 20, 2008